Is Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lung Cancer Best for You?
Minimally invasive thoracic surgery is often less painful and offers a shorter recovery time for early-stage lung cancer patients. Is it a good option for you?
If you have early-stage lung cancer, you may want to talk to your doctor about minimally invasive thoracic surgery. If this option is right for you, it typically means less pain and a quicker recovery than with a standard operation.
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
Thoracic surgeon Daniel Raymond, MD, says he’s able to use minimally invasive techniques around 80 to 90 percent of the time. When it’s right for the patient, it’s the best option, he says.
During minimally invasive thoracic surgery, a thin tube with a camera gives the surgeon a view into the chest without having to make a large incision or spread the ribs. He or she inserts specialized tools through other small incisions to perform the operation. This can be accomplished by VATS (video-assisted thoracic surgery) or robotic surgery.
“We can treat most patients with early-stage lung cancers with video-assisted or robotic thoracic surgery,” Dr. Raymond says. “In fact, virtually every oncologic disease of the lung and esophagus — as well as benign disease of the chest — can often be treated with a minimally invasive approach.”
In the past, the only way to remove part of a lung (lobectomy) was with open chest surgery (thoracotomy). This option requires one large incision (6 to 8 inches) in the chest between the ribs, Dr. Raymond says.
Today, with better technology, thoracic surgeons often can use minimally invasive techniques. That usually means they’ll need only three, 1-inch incisions, he says.
In medical terms, you’ll get the same quality cancer operation but much less pain with minimally invasive thoracic surgery. What it means to you, says Dr. Raymond, is “fewer days in the hospital, less pain, less dependency on narcotic pain medication and a quicker return to normal activities.”
Furthermore, this approach leaves less scar tissue in your chest. If you need surgery later, the chances are better that a second minimally invasive procedure will work. There is additionally less disruption of normal chest wall function.
Another plus: If the surgeon runs into any safety issues, he or she can easily switch to open surgery.
In some cases, open chest surgery is better for you. That’s the case if you have a history of pulmonary infections or have had:
However, at this time, not all thoracic surgeons have the training or experience to use a minimally invasive approach. So it’s a good idea to talk to your doctors early about your goals and expectations.
Make sure your surgeon knows that you want to explore a minimally invasive option. Ask how frequently he or she performs the surgery. “You want to get a sense of their comfort level and experience,” Dr. Raymond says.
Ultimately, it may not work for you. But you’ll want to decide based on your medical condition and history. You don’t want a doctor’s preference or lack of training to limit your options, he says.
If the surgeon you’re working with lacks experience with minimally invasive approaches, it’s sometimes best to get another opinion or a new referral, Dr. Raymond says.